I’m working on a featured article about how FX/CFD brokers are expanding product coverage without weakening their core proposition. The article will explore how brokers decide which new products to add, how they balance client demand with operational complexity, and how they avoid becoming a “supermarket” of tradable assets with no clear identity. I’m especially interested in practical aspects such as product selection, liquidity access, platform design, risk management, regulation, education, and how brokers maintain their core strengths while broadening their offering. I’d be interested in including your perspective. A few questions: What is driving FX/CFD brokers to expand product coverage beyond their traditional core markets? How should brokers decide which new instruments or asset classes are worth adding, and which ones are just noise? What are the biggest operational or risk‑management challenges when expanding product coverage? How can brokers add more markets without making the trading experience too cluttered or confusing for clients? Does product expansion risk diluting a broker’s brand or core value proposition? How can that be avoided? How important are education, research, and platform tools when brokers introduce new products to retail traders? Are there product areas you expect to see more demand for over the next 12–24 months, such as indices, commodities, single stocks, crypto CFDs, thematic baskets, options, or 24/5 markets? From a technology or liquidity standpoint, what separates brokers that expand product coverage successfully from those that simply add more symbols?