In any listing agreement or purchase contract, the "liquidated damages clause" is crucial because it determines the compensation if either party breaches the contract. This clause is especially important because it sets a clear financial expectation, avoiding costly and prolonged litigation. From my experience at Fritch Law Office, I've seen cases where this clarity in advanced agreements saved clients from financial distress when buyers backed out at the last minute. In one case involving a commercial property in Indiana, the liquidated damages clause included a set amount that the buyer would forfeit if they failed to close. When the buyer backed out due to financing issues, my client quickly received compensation, allowing them to relist without dragging through lengthy legal proceedings. This not only preserved their cash flow but also maintained their market position. Make sure this clause is carefully negotiated to protect your interests. An overly punitive clause could drive potential buyers away, while a negligible one offers insufficient protection. Crafting a balanced liquidated damages clause provides security and reflects mutual commitment in the transaction.
A clause I always recommend sellers pay close attention to in their listing agreement or purchase contract is the "Price and Terms" clause. This may seem obvious, but it is often overlooked or not fully understood by many sellers. The reason it's so important is that it outlines not only the sale price but also the terms of the sale, including contingencies, financing details, and deadlines. For example, a seller might agree to an offer, but the contract may contain a financing contingency, which means the sale is dependent on the buyer securing a loan. If the buyer is not approved, the contract could fall through, and the seller may have to start over. Similarly, the closing deadline is a key detail. If the buyer misses this, it could delay the sale and potentially cost the seller time and money, especially if they've already lined up their next move. Having a clear understanding of this clause ensures that sellers agree to a price and are comfortable with the conditions under which that price is being offered. It provides peace of mind, knowing that both sides are on the same page about what must happen for the transaction to close smoothly. As a top producer, I've seen many deals fall apart simply because a seller wasn't fully aware of the contingencies or timelines in the contract. I always ensure my clients are well-informed and prepared to avoid surprises down the line. Understanding these details upfront is key to a successful and stress-free sale.
As a real estate professional with years of experience in Phoenix, I always tell sellers to pay close attention to the "contingency clause" in their listing agreement or purchase contract. This clause is absolutely crucial because it sets out the conditions under which the buyer can back out of the deal or even demand repairs or price adjustments during the transaction. For example, a common contingency is the home inspection contingency, which allows the buyer to conduct a home inspection and request repairs or renegotiate the price based on the findings. If the seller isn't careful, this can lead to unexpected delays or the deal falling through entirely. Without understanding the full scope of these contingencies, sellers might be blindsided when the buyer requests repairs or decides to back out altogether, leaving the property off the market for longer than anticipated. This is so important because it can affect the seller's bottom line and timeline. In a competitive market like Phoenix, having the right contingencies or negotiating their terms upfront can mean the difference between a smooth transaction and an unexpected setback. Sellers must understand their rights and responsibilities within these clauses to avoid surprises and ensure they aren't stuck in a holding pattern. At the same time, the buyer uses these contingencies as leverage. So, my advice to sellers is simple: before signing any agreement, take the time to review and understand the contingency clauses fully. It's a small step that can save you a lot of stress down the road, and I'm always happy to guide my clients through it to ensure their protection.
As a real estate professional with over a decade of experience, I always recommend that sellers pay close attention to one essential clause in their listing agreement or purchase contract, which is the "termination clause" or "exit strategy" provision. This clause outlines the circumstances under which either party-typically the seller or the listing agent-can terminate the agreement before the property is sold. Understanding this clause is crucial because it offers both flexibility and protection for the seller. If the seller becomes dissatisfied with the progress of the sale, such as if the home isn't attracting enough interest or the terms aren't aligned with their goals, the termination clause can provide a way to part ways with the listing agent without significant penalties. This clause can also address what happens if the home sells under conditions less favorable than the seller had hoped, such as an offer with too many contingencies or an unusually low price. The reason I emphasize the importance of this clause is that it can safeguard sellers from feeling locked into a deal that isn't working for them. It gives them a clear exit route if things aren't progressing as expected, allowing them to pivot or adjust as needed. In a competitive market like Metro Atlanta, it's critical to have the flexibility to make informed decisions and avoid being stuck in an agreement that no longer serves your best interests. Ensuring that the termination clause is fair and well understood will give sellers peace of mind and allow them to navigate the process confidently, knowing they can act in their best interests at any time.
At my company, we've seen sellers get confused about the dual agency disclosure, which is when the same agent represents both buyer and seller. I always explain this clause thoroughly because it affects how information gets shared and negotiations are handled - just last month, a seller wasn't aware their agent was also working with the buyer, which created some awkward moments during price negotiations.
Real estate listing agreements must include a commission structure, which sellers should pay particular attention to. Typically, this clause outlines how much the seller will pay the real estate agent, expressed as a percentage of the sale price. Understanding this clause is crucial because it directly impacts the seller's net proceeds from the sale. For instance, if the commission is set at 6%, and the property sells for $500,000, the seller would owe $30,000 in commission fees. As part of this clause, it is also specified whether the commission will be divided between the seller's agent and the buyer's agent. Negotiations and the cost of selling the property can be affected by this. Keeping the commission structure clear helps sellers avoid unexpected charges and ensures that they are aware of their financial obligations.
Make sure you know who's paying closing costs is a non-negotiable. We almost missed that a buyer had us covering over $3,000 in closing costs in the agreement! Thankfully our broker pointed it out in time. Paying attention to closing costs can save (or cost) you thousands of dollars. You need to make sure you know who is paying the costs for the title search, title policy, any realtor fees, and taxes. Often times a buyer will want a new survey, and may even add a provision that the seller will provide one and even has to pay for it. Use something like ChatGPT to review the contract and explain it to you in simple English, and ask it to tell you what closing costs that you as the buyer or seller will be needing to pay.
With the change in rules this summer around real estate commissions, I make sure that my clients understand who is paying what real estate commissions. There was a lot of drama about the change, but I find that in reality, the market works pretty much the same way it did before August. What's most important, though, is that everyone understand where those commissions are coming from. I've worked with buyer clients who paid their own commissions, and I've worked with sellers who have still agreed to pay buyer agent commissions. The language in the contract needs to be crystal clear about who is paying, though, otherwise a seller may unexpectedly pay more through the transaction than they realize. The way I bring this information to my clients attention, especially if there are multiple offers, is to lay out all the numbers on a Net Sheet that details what they can expect to pay. Sometimes a higher offer where the seller is paying the buyer agent commissions can net them less than another offer where the buyer is paying their own agent, so it is critical not only to ensure what the language says in the contract, but also to make an apples-to-apples comparison so that my seller clients truly understand what their financial outcome will be.
Many 'standard-form' MLS-issued real estate Listing Agreements have a clause that guarantee's the agent's commission after an agreement has been reached, even if the Seller is unwilling or unable to close. Sellers should be aware of the implications here...if a transaction falls apart after becoming binding, the Seller may be on the hook for one or both of the agent's commission...even if the transaction does not complete. I recommend careful review of the Listing Agreement and speaking with your representative about the implications of this clause, and how scenarios may unfold, before agreeing to list a property.
One of the most important clauses for sellers to carefully consider in a purchase agreement is the inspection period. This clause specifies the time frame the buyer has to inspect the property and decide whether to proceed with the purchase. If the buyer decides not to move forward during this period, they are typically entitled to a full refund of their earnest money deposit (EMD). Although the inspection period is designed for identifying issues with the property, buyers can technically back out for any reason during this window without facing repercussions. This creates potential risks for the seller. For example, agreeing to a 10-15 day inspection period locks the seller into a contract with a buyer who has no obligation to stay committed for that length of time. For single-family homes, a standard inspection can usually be completed within five days. Accepting an offer with an inspection period exceeding 10 days is generally unnecessary and increases the risk of delays or complications. Sellers should aim for a shorter inspection period to minimize uncertainty and ensure a smoother transaction.
The inspection contingency clause is something I've seen trip up countless sellers in my years investing in Central Ohio. Last month, a seller I worked with lost valuable time when the buyer requested extensive repairs after inspection, but the contract language wasn't clear on repair limits or timelines. I always recommend sellers carefully review this clause to specify maximum repair costs they're willing to cover and set firm deadlines for inspection completion and repair negotiations.
The Importance of Understanding Commission Clauses In my experience, one of the most essential clauses sellers should focus on in their listing agreement is the commission structure. This clause outlines the percentage of the sale price that will go to the listing agent and, often, the buyer's agent. Sellers sometimes overlook how commissions are split or misunderstand what happens if a buyer approaches without their own agent. For example, I've seen sellers agree to terms that require them to pay the full commission regardless of whether the buyer had representation, leaving them surprised at closing. It's crucial to have a detailed conversation with your agent about how the commission works in all scenarios and to ensure you're comfortable with what's in writing. Protecting Against Contingency Risks Another critical detail to review is the section addressing contingencies, particularly the financing and inspection contingencies. From what I've seen, these clauses can either protect the seller or create opportunities for a deal to fall apart. For example, a broad inspection clause might allow the buyer to back out for minor issues, leaving the seller scrambling to relist. Sellers should work closely with their real estate agent to negotiate reasonable time frames and conditions, ensuring that the buyer's contingencies are fair but don't unnecessarily delay the process or put the seller at a disadvantage. A well-written agreement helps both parties move toward closing with fewer surprises.
I recently had a seller overlook the inspection contingency timeline in their contract, which led to a two-week delay when the buyer requested additional time for specialized inspections. I always recommend my clients carefully review not just the standard inspection period (usually 10-14 days) but also understand their obligations during this time, like providing access to the property and responding to repair requests within specified deadlines.
Chief Executive Officer | Attorney I Entrepreneur I Leadership and Organizational Development
Answered 9 months ago
A key clause in any state to keep a close eye on is the disclosure of defects clause. Although state laws vary, it is crucial for a seller to understand whether they need to disclose any known defects or issues with the property to a buyer. Some issues with a property may include foundation cracks, roof leaks, and plumbing problems. It's vital for a seller to know what and when they are required to disclose and what their liability is if they don't. For buyers, they must have a thorough understanding of how to handle inspections and follow-up inspections based on what the seller discloses, as well as what the buyer discovers on their own.
The release and transfer clause can make or break any agreement. This clause isn't just legal jargon. It's your roadmap that shows exactly what you're giving up and what you'll get back. Think of it as your safety net. It spells out when everything officially changes hands. At Freedland Harwin Valori Gander, I've sat with countless clients through tough situations. When this clause isn't crystal clear, things can get messy. People end up fighting over responsibilities. They argue about when these responsibilities should change hands. Let me tell you why this matters so much. A solid release and transfer clause puts everything on paper. It covers the when, what, and how of the deal. I've seen many legal battles start simply. People had different ideas about these basic points. Your rights and obligations need to be spelled out. Your timing needs to be clear in black and white. That's why I always tell clients not to rush through this part. Get a good lawyer to look it over. You don't want to discover gaps in your protection later. I've seen this happen too many times. Trust me, preventing these issues is much easier than fixing them later.
One important clause that I recommend sellers must pay close attention to in their real estate listing agreement or purchase contract is the "Contingency Clause" as it sets out specific conditions that must be met for the sale to proceed such as the buyer securing the money, passing a site inspection, or selling their existing property. It's really important to understand this particular clause because it can considerably impact the timing and certainty of your sale, especially in cases where the buyer can only buy your property after selling their own or getting a loan approved. This is also true in cases when the buyer's offer is dependent on satisfactory property inspection or else they might walk away from the deal. Sellers can manage their expectations well and avoid any instances that catch them off guard by being clear on the contingencies in their contracts. This can also allow them to negotiate terms that limit the timeline of these contingencies or entertain other offers when the buyer fails to meet deadlines and avoid ending up stuck waiting on a buyer who might not be able to follow through. Understanding this clause gives sellers more control and helps protect their interests.
One important term that sellers must pay attention to in a real estate listing agreement is the "commission structure and payment terms." This term describes the seller's remuneration in the amount of commission that the listing agent will charge him for his services, often expressed as a percentage of the sales price of the property, plus the question whether or not this commissions also includes the buyer's agent's commission. The significance of making the effort of comprehending this clause cannot be overemphasised as it directly speaks to the amount that the seller will have at hand after the payment. For example, I have observed some sellers taking it as a fact that no changes can be made into the commission terms, only to discover later that they could have either elaborated or even modified the rate in the beginning. Ignorance of how commissions are divided, particularly when a buyer's agent is present, tends to bring about unanticipated closeout deductibles. By reading through this information and going through it with the agent, the sellers managed to avoid confusion and in some cases even avoided losing thousands of dollars. As it is always a good practice to ask questions, state all presumptions in writing and alternately seek to check other similar agreements - this is a good practice here for the protection of the seller's interest.
One critical clause on the listing agreement side is the commission structure. This defines, in percentage terms, how much of the property sale price goes directly to the real estate agent upon successful sale. Understanding this clause is particularly important because it affects the seller's net proceeds and may be negotiated in the course of a negotiation with a potential buyer. Setting it too high may deter buyers from buying or even reduce the final sale price. Second, the commission split can be made clear between listing agents and buyer's agents to avoid confusion later down the line. Sellers should, therefore, check they are comfortable with the terms agreed upon and that they will receive the service and support they expect from their agent. This is important information that would enable sellers to make appropriate decisions in the selling process and avoid any surprises at the financial level.
This clause determines the portions of the sale price that will be paid out to the listing agent and, in many instances, the buyer's agent as well. It's important since this fee essentially diminishes what you get from the sale. Such sellers need to state if the rate of the commission can be freely negotiated as well as if it includes dual agency situations. For example, one seller whom I had initially consulted did not know that his agreement would require him to pay the full commission even when the buyer went without an agent, thus multiplying the agent's earnings by two. Knowing this made it possible for them to renegotiate for better terms before signing. A seller who knows how to navigate through the tiny lines on commissions' terms places himself in a cushy position whereby there would be no shocks during closing and all his interests are protected while ensuring maximization of the value retained from the sale.
In my 20-plus years as an insurance provider in Florida's volatile market, I've seen the critical importance of having a solid "Insurance Contingency" clause in listing agreements or purchase contracts, especially for properties in risk-prone areas. One memorable case involved a property owner near the Gulf Coast who overlooked flood insurance requirements. After a hurricane, the resulting damage left them with catastrophic financial losses since the clause failed to mandate proof of flood insurance coverage, which is crucial in high-risk zones. Focusing on areas like Florida, where flood risks aren't just a potential threat but almost a certainty, this clause becomes vital. Properly detailed insurance contingencies can protect both sellers and buyers. For instance, ensuring flood insurance is in place and understanding its coverage options before completing a transaction can prevent disputes and costly misunderstandings later. In my experience, having clear documentation requirements in these clauses can save both parties significant headaches.