I'm interested in participating in a project that focuses on predicting creator outcomes, but I see more les on the architectural side and not as a voyeuristic observer. When you make a wager on someone else's personal health metrics and habits, you're performing a decentralized human behavior modeling experiment through social and economic conditions (decentralized prediction markets). These types of markets allow us to collaborate in real time by experimenting with how our social systems (incentives) influence the decision making of others and how the transparency of data impacts people's ability to trust one another's choices in what they create. We're starting to see an increase in these types of projects that involve prediction markets based on creator cultures. Many people are looking for more ways to put their skin in the game with creators (through decentralization). There needs to be a very clear proof of concept before I would become involved in any experimental or "strange" project. I'm really drawn to projects where the creator uses specific experimental methods (using a transparent audit trail, for instance) to validate their own accomplishments based on their unique coordinates in the space. The outcomes of those experiments have the potential to provide unique solutions to the coordination problems facing creators, or to create a unique feedback loop that creates a new way to think about sovereignty in the digital realm. The main value derived from these types of projects is in observing where humans resist the available data. While the technology enables almost any interaction to be tokenized, the most valuable projects will be those that recognize the challenges of being continuously connected ("always on") and that demonstrate how to use the data collected through those connections in a more meaningful social or artistic manner.
Experimental platforms can be creative, but I would not join one that lets people bet on someone's health or personal habits. At PuroClean, trust and privacy guide every decision we make. I believe real lives are not entertainment assets. I would only consider a project if it protected dignity, used clear consent, and focused on positive goals like community fitness challenges. If an artist built it around transparency and shared learning, we might explore it as a team. People engage when they feel safe and respected. The key lesson is that innovation must never ignore human values, even if the idea feels bold and new.