Answer this question, get featured on Lattice

F

find-mba.comI'm writing a piece on the recent trend of schools, including Stanford, Columbia, and SDA Bocconi, disappearing from major rankings such as the FT, Fortune, and The Economist in recent years. It's partly due to schools being unable to collect enough responses from their alumni, and partly due to frustration with perceived unfair methodology. I want to explore the impact this has on students—whether rankings still hold the same prestige and how students are comparing schools (e.g., employment reports or alternative rankings based on measures like social impact or career outcomes). I'd like to hear from some non-elite schools to get their perspectives.

A

Aura SocialWhat Makes a Professional Network Trustworthy for Job Seekers? I'm researching what signals and structural features make a professional networking platform feel genuinely trustworthy to job seekers especially those who have experienced spam, ghost listings, or data misuse on major platforms. I'm looking for insights from career coaches, recruiters, HR technology researchers, UX researchers, and professionals who have recently navigated a job search. Specifically: • What platform features build or destroy trust with job seekers? • How do fake or ghost job listings affect long-term platform credibility? • What role do transparency signals (company verification, poster identity) play? • How does pricing (free vs paywalled access) influence perceived fairness? • What must a new professional network do to earn trust from job seekers? Please include your name, role, company, website, and any relevant data or examples if possible.

H

HRSpotlightMoving beyond diversity metrics and hiring quotas, how do you measure the sentiment of 'belonging' within your teams?

This deadline has passed

View Similar Opportunities